3
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
9 / 3
Mentions
10-80309-CIV- JANE DOE No. 103, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFERY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ------------~/ DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S
[email protected] Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein By: =+-t-::±::::1=-::-:--:-::::--:::c: ROBER .
s. JEFFERY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ------------~/ DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS.COUNT VI & FOR MORE DEFINITE
8691 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein By: =+-t-::±::::1=-::-:--:-::::--:::c:
universal appeal." Kaiser, 494 U.S., at 855, 110 S.Ct., at 1586 (SCALIA, J., concurring). In a free, dyn
e, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423 and 2. Counts Five and Six charge the defendant with perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. 1 ARGUMENT I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case The defendant seeks to dismiss the Indictment based on a 2007 non-prosecution agreement ("NPA"
in illegal sex acts, and aiding and abetting the same, in violation 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2. Count Three charges the defendant with conspiring with Epstein and others to transport minors to participate in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Count Four charges the defendant with transporti
NARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant
f America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00099941 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case. 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New Yolk 4 1. The Text of the Agreement
ese types of crimes in its amendments, and because there is no ex post facto problem here, the prosecution was timely."), cert. denied, No.20-5064, S.Ct. , 2021 WL 78235 (Jan. 11, 2021); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) (denying motion
the bastions of an ordered liberty." Edna Selan Epstein, The Attorney—Client Privilege and the Work— *84
Page: EFTA00032867 →been communicated to the prosecutors and used to the defendants' detriment, there is no constitutional violation. Weatherford, 429 U.S. at 558, 97 S.Ct. at 845; Kelly 790 F.2d at 137. In this instance, based upon the evidence and testimony offered at the evidentiary hearing, including the demeanor
Page: EFTA00032868 →Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and S.Ct.

George Mitchell
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Bill Richardson
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Eric Schmidt
PERSONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONWright
PERSONSweet
PERSONGibson
PERSON
Howell
PERSONCasey
PERSONDistrict of Columbia
LOCATIONGoodwin
PERSON
Napolitano
PERSONUSI Film Products
ORGANIZATIONReeves
PERSON