Epstein Secrets

nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers