Epstein Secrets

From: Chris DiIon° <MIMI > To: EFTA00072134 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 20:11:20

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

From: Chris DiIon° <MIMI > To: EFTA00065103 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:45:00

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

From: Chris DiIon° <MIMI > To: EFTA00082825 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:37:36

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

From: Chris DiIon° <MI > To: EFTA00082705 Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 14:08:18 +0

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers