Epstein Secrets

ltiples of the revenue generated by stand alone KCG/Knight doing "similar or less" volume. The quarter I refer to: 1Q2014. My "March 2014 letter to McKessy". Where ANOTHER massive ibcrease in OTCM share volumes occurred. AND where an immediate investigation SHOULD have been triggered. It did not. In fac

d consistent with the PROTECTION OF INVESTORS to grant the Exchange (MEMX), on behalf of its Members (NITE,CDEL et al) a LIMITED exemption from the Contra Party Identity Requirement in Rule 10b-10(a)(2)(i)(A)" "Sincerely, J Matthew DeLesDernier Grossly Corrupt SEC" Mr Gensler: did the SEC grant ANY OTHER 10b10 Reporting Exemptions to A

ltiples of the revenue generated by stand alone KCG/Knight doing "similar or less" volume. The quarter I refer to: 1Q2014. My "March 2014 letter to McKessy". Where ANOTHER massive ibcrease in OTCM share volumes occurred. AND where an immediate investigation SHOULD have been triggered. It did not. In fac

d consistent with the PROTECTION OF INVESTORS to grant the Exchange (MEMX), on behalf of its Members (NITE,CDEL et al) a LIMITED exemption from the Contra Party Identity Requirement in Rule 10b-10(a)(2)(i)(A)" "Sincerely, J Matthew DeLesDernier Grossly Corrupt SEC" Mr Gensler: did the SEC grant ANY OTHER 10b10 Reporting Exemptions to A

revenue generated by stand alone KCG/Knight doing "similar or less" volume. The quarter I refer to: 1Q2014. EFTA00070049 My "March 2014 letter to McKessy". Where ANOTHER massive ibcrease in OTCM share volumes occurred. AND where an immediate investigation SHOULD have been triggered. It did not. In fac

d consistent with the PROTECTION OF INVESTORS to grant the Exchange (MEMX), on behalf of its Members (NITE,CDEL et al) a LIMITED exemption from the Contra Party Identity Requirement in Rule 10b-10(a)(2)(i)(A)" "Sincerely, J Matthew DeLesDernier Grossly Corrupt SEC" Mr Gensler: did the SEC grant ANY OTHER 10b10 Reporting Exemptions to A

ltiples of the revenue generated by stand alone KCG/Knight doing "similar or less" volume. The quarter I refer to: 1Q2014. My "March 2014 letter to McKessy". Where ANOTHER massive ibcrease in OTCM share volumes occurred. AND where an immediate investigation SHOULD have been triggered. It did not. In fac

d consistent with the PROTECTION OF INVESTORS to grant the Exchange (MEMX), on behalf of its Members (NITE,CDEL et al) a LIMITED exemption from the Contra Party Identity Requirement in Rule 10b-10(a)(2)(i)(A)" EFTA00071968 "Sincerely, J Matthew DeLesDernier Grossly Corrupt SEC" Mr Gensler: did the SEC grant ANY OTHER 10b10 Reporting