Epstein Secrets

her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are int

age to a very rich man on Palm . arguing because didn't want JD#2 to do a massage. JD#2 dea nd =began ato go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that JD#2 knew she would have

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

e e to a very rich man on Palm Beach. and began arguing because didn't want to do a massage. decided to go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that knew she would have to s

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

very rich man on Palm Beach. and began arguing because didn't want JD#16 to do a massage. JD#16 decided to go anyway so that she could make $200. JD#2 states that she knew she would have to take her top off and that Epstein would masturbate during the massage. states that JD#16 knew she would have