Epstein Secrets

her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are int

ual conduct 2423(b) EPSTEIN JEGE 40 2/24/05 Travel in interstate commerce with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct 2423(b) EPSTEIN HYPERION 42 3/18/05 Travel in interstate commerce with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct 2423(b) EPSTEIN JEGE 43 3/31/05 Travel in interst

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. caused one ore more telephone calls to EFTA02857786 conduct HYPERION 35 1/6/05 Travel in interstate commerce with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct 2423(b) EPSTEIN HYPERION 36 1/14/05 Travel in inte

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. #. On or about May 6, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN and caused Jane Doe #3 to make a telephone call to 917-855-3363. #. On or about May 6,