Epstein Secrets

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical worth used in different parts of the same act are in

and they often went to Epstein's house together. Jane Doe #4 told Epstein that she and JD#3 went to the same school and were in the same class, and JD#4 told Epstein that she was a junior. There also is evidence that Epstein gave JD#3 a vibrator for her 18th birthday, knowing that it was her 18th bir

her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are int

and they often went to Epstein's house together. Jane Doe #4 told Epstein that she and JD#3 went to the same school and were in the same class, and JD#4 told Epstein that she was a junior in high school. There also is evidence that Epstein gave JD#3 a vibrator for her 18th birthday, knowing that it

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

and they often went to Epstein's house together. Jane Doe #4 told Epstein that she and JD#3 went to the same school and were in the same class, and JD#4 told Epstein that she was a junior. There also is evidence that Epstein gave JD#3 a vibrator for her 18th birthday, knowing that it was her 18th bir