Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act.. . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p3
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
Page: EFTA02857732_p3 →Page EFTA02857732_p11
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
Page: EFTA02857732_p11 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p3
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
Page: EFTA02857763_p3 →Page EFTA02857763_p11
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
Page: EFTA02857763_p11 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p3
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
Page: EFTA02857810_p3 →Page EFTA02857810_p11
broadens the conduct covered by the guideline beyond prostitution to encompass all commercial sex acts, consistent with the scope of the Act. . . . U.S.S.G. App. C, Vol II, Amendment 641 (emphasis added). The reference to child pornography is especially helpful to us, because the child pornography statutes
Page: EFTA02857810_p11 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (136)
Entities connected to both Jones Court and U.S.S.G. App
JB
Janusz Banasiak
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Northern Region
LOCATION5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Alexander Acosta
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
LB
Leon Black
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Naomi Campbell
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
ME
Meacham
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Philadelphia
LOCATION5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
CW
Courtney Wild
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Mortensen
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Robert Maxwell
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Jacksonville
LOCATION5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Criminal Division
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
DR
Drury
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Cleveland
LOCATION5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.
Jencks
PERSON5 w/ Jones·7 w/ U.S.S.G.