Epstein Secrets

sely used only sparingly. Notably, the most recent reported decision in the 11th Circuit involving the Mann Act was decided in 1984. United States v. Phelps, 733 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir. 1984). EFTA00310821 LAW OFFICCS 01 Omani B. ISECOURT, P.C. tates Attorney Southern District of Florida June 25, 200

stretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modem day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting the internet trolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young

ely used only sparingly. Notably, the most recent reported decision in the I l th Circuit involving the Mann Act was decided in 1984. United States I Phelps, 733 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir. 1984). EFTA00176493 LAW OrrICES OP GERALD B. LutrcouTer, P.C. Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Matthew Menchcl, Esq. Andrew Lou

tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting thentemebrolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peop

sely used only sparingly. Notably, the most recent reported decision in the 11th Circuit involving the Mann Act was decided in 1984. United States v. Phelps, 733 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir. 1984). EFTA01729580 taw OFFICF.8 OF Graexam B. LEFC01713T, P.C. Office of the United States Attorney Southern Distri

tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting th(internerolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peo

ely used only sparingly. Notably, the most recent reported decision in the Il th Circuit involving the Mann Act was decided in 1984. United States v. Phelps, 733 F.2d 1464 (11th Cir. 1984). Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013312 EFTA00230217 IAVI OFFICF-1 OF GERALD B. larccran, P.C. Esq. A. Villafa

tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting th(mtemebrolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peop