4
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
dibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s
Hersh specifically mentions "sexual activity with a minor," knowledge of age is not required, as discussed above. 17 EFTA00234533 United States Hoschouer, F.3d 2007 WL 979931, *1 (11th Cir. Apr. 3, 2007). The decision of the Eleventh Circuit was consistent with every other circuit that has addresse
e travel. In other words, the Government must show that the Defendant's criminal purpose was not merely incidental to the travel. United States v. Hoschouer, F.3d,_, 2007 WL 979931, *1 (11th Cir. Apr. 3, 2007). The decision of the Eleventh Circuit was consistent with every other circuit that has addres
Page: EFTA02857524_p17 →dibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#6 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s
Page: EFTA02857524_p57 →e travel. In other words, the Government must show that the Defendant's criminal purpose was not merely incidental to the travel. United States v. Hoschouer , F.3d 2007 WL 979931, *1 (11th Cir. Apr. 3, 2007). The decision of the Eleventh Circuit was consistent with every other circuit that has addresse
Page: EFTA02857732_p9 →edibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s
Page: EFTA02857732_p24 →e travel. In other words, the Government must show that the Defendant's criminal purpose was not merely incidental to the travel. United States v. Hoschouer , F.3d 2007 WL 979931, *1 (11th Cir. Apr. 3, 2007). The decision of the Eleventh Circuit was consistent with every other circuit that has addresse
Page: EFTA02857763_p9 →edibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#8 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s
Page: EFTA02857763_p35 →Entities connected to both the State Grand Jury and Hoschouer

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONGerald Lefcourt
PERSONJanusz Banasiak
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
David Copperfield
PERSONEllis
PERSONRoy Black
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONAnn Sanchez
PERSONEvans
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Mortensen
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Robert Maxwell
PERSON
Nelson
PERSON
Naomi Campbell
PERSON
Costa Rica
LOCATIONthe Third Circuit's
ORGANIZATION