Epstein Secrets

irls on Epstein's own behalf, I don't believe that Epstein's personal use of the prostitutes can be considered a business enterprise. III. Victims A. Jane Doe #1 a)AMI. Some time in early 2004, the exact date being unknown, Jane Doe #1 was approached by two individuals, and Tony, while at a beach club on

ne system was a facility of interstate commerce." United States v. Roberts , 2006 WL 827293 n.1 (11th Cir. Mar. 30, 2006). See also United States v. Strevell , 2006 WL 1697529, *3 (11th Cir. June 20, 2006) (finding that a defendant's placing of "numerous phone calls from Philadelphia to Miami in order to

ne system was a facility of interstate commerce." United States v. Roberts , 2006 WL 827293 n.1 (11th Cir. Mar. 30, 2006). See also United States v. Strevell , 2006 WL 1697529, *3 (11th Cir. June 20, 2006) (finding that a defendant's placing of "numerous phone calls from Philadelphia to Miami in order to

irls on Epstein's own behalf, I don't believe that Epstein's personal use of the prostitutes can be considered a business enterprise. III. VICTIMS A. Jane Doe #5 aa EFTA02857779 Some time in early 2004, the exact date being unknown, Jane Doe #5 was approached by two individuals, and Tony, while at a be

ne system was a facility of interstate commerce." United States v. Roberts , 2006 WL 827293 n.1 (11th Cir. Mar. 30, 2006). See also United States v. Strevell , 2006 WL 1697529, *3 (11th Cir. June 20, 2006) (finding that a defendant's placing of "numerous phone calls from Philadelphia to Miami in order to

irls on Epstein's own behalf, I don't believe that Epstein's personal use of the prostitutes can be considered a business enterprise. III. Victims A. Jane Doe #1 (a) - 1. Facts Some time in early 2004, the exact date being unknown, Jane Doe #1 was approached by two individuals, and Tony, while at a bea