Epstein Secrets

llege 12/22/2004, alleged that Southern raised at least $25 million through a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of short-term notes on behalf of UC Properties LLC. Source Information RDC URL: https://cid.rdc.com/wss/entiN.html?entityld=c5d5dba1600b31415d3f3d53eb346cc4 Source Name: SEC Litigation Releases - 2

s and Exchange Commission v. Southern Financial Group, Inc., Richard M. Wooten, Charles Dennis McKittrick and Gerald F. Hunter. Jr., Defendants, and Springdale Investments, Inc., Relief Defendant. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, Civil Action File No. 2:02-1806-18 • SEC

llege 12/22/2004, alleged that Southern raised at least $25 million through a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of short-term notes on behalf of UC Properties LLC. Source Information RDC URL: https://cid.rdc.com/vms/entiN.html?entityld=c5d5dba1600b3145d3f3d53eb346cc4 Source Name: SEC Litigation Releases - 20

s and Exchange Commission v. Southern Financial Group, Inc., Richard M. Wooten, Charles Dennis McKittrick and Gerald F. Hunter. Jr., Defendants, and Springdale Investments, Inc., Relief Defendant. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, Civil Action File No. 2:02-1806-18 • SEC

lege 12/22/2004, alleged that Southern raised at least $25 million through a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of short-term notes on behalf of UC Properties LLC. Source Information RDC URL: https://grid.rdc.com/wss/entity.html?- entityld=c5d5dba1600b314f5d3f3d53eb346cc4 Source Name: SEC Litigation Releases

and Exchange Commission v. Southern Financial Group, Inc., Richard M. Wooten, Charles Dennis McKittrick and Gerald F. Hunter, Jr., Defendants, and Springdale Investments, Inc., Relief Defendant, United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, Civil Action File No. 2:02-1806-18 • SE

M. Wooten and Charles Dennis McKittrick raised at least $25 million through a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of short-term notes on behalf of UC Properties LLC; that defendants operated these note offerings as a Ponzi scheme, using funds raised from current note offerings to pay principal and interest to in

rrent note offerings to pay principal and interest to investors in prior offerings, and that at least $5 million was transferred to relief defendant Springdale Investments, Inc.; that Southern operated in violation of the net capital rule since at least October 2001, and that the firm's FOCUS reports and other books and rec

M. Wooten and Charles Dennis McKittrick raised at least $25 million through a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of short-term notes on behalf of UC Properties LLC; that defendants operated these note offerings as a Ponzi scheme, using funds raised from current note offerings to pay principal and interest to in

rrent note offerings to pay principal and interest to investors in prior offerings, and that at least $5 million was transferred to relief defendant Springdale Investments, Inc.; that Southern operated in violation of the net capital rule since at least October 2001, and that the firm's FOCUS reports and other books and rec