Epstein Secrets

ctivity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in instructing the jury that "it was sufficient for the Government to prove that

d traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulestream 75 EFTA02857594 aircraft owned by Defendant, HYPERION, AIR, INC. 76. On January 1, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Anguilla, British West Indies.to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream

activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in instructing the jury that "it was sufficient for the Government to prove tha

efendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 11. On June 3, 2004, Defendant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. 12. On June 4, 2004, Defendants

activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in instructing the jury that "it was sufficient for the Government to prove tha

fendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. #. On or about May 6, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN and caused Jane Doe #3 to make a telephone call to 917-855-3363. #. On or about May 6, 2005, Defenda