Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
ORGANIZATIONthe Criminal Division of the DOJ
ORGANIZATION3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
s exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. See Exs. G, K, L. Indeed, from late 2007 to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys attempted to convince senior attorney at CEOS that Ep
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
s exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. See Exs. G, K, L. Indeed, from late 2007 to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys attempted to convince senior attorney at CEOS that Ep
RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi
s exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. See Exs. G, K, L. Indeed, from late 2007 to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys attempted to convince senior attorney at CEOS that Ep
Entities connected to both Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the Criminal Division of the DOJ

Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJames Eisenberg
PERSON
John Roth
PERSON
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONthe District of Columbia
LOCATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSONG, K
ORGANIZATIONBENJAMIN G. GREENBERG
PERSON
Jason Richards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONJacqueline Perczek
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONAce Greenberg
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSON
Alice Fisher
PERSONFISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION