Epstein Secrets

hat the current [party's] representation 'may be inadequate,' and the burden for making such a showing is 'minimal.'" Id. (emphasis added), quoting Clark v. Putnam County, 168 F.3d 458, 461 (11th Cir. 1999). See, e.g., Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 302 F.3d 1242, 1255 (11th Cir. 2002)("The propose

denied the opportunity to seek to protect his private interests in the matter. See Section I(B), infra. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. Maintaining the confidentiality of grand jury proceedings protects several important interests of the governm

that the current [party's) representation `may be inadequate,' and the burden for making such a showing is 'minimal."' Id. (emphasis added), quoting Clark v. Putnam County, 168 F.3d 458, 461 (11th Cir. 1999). See, e.g., Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 302 F.3d 1242, 1255 (11th Cir. 2002) ("The propos

ion to dismiss, satisfies the timeliness requirement for intervention, both as of right and permissive. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. Mr. Epstein unquestionably has an interest in opposing rescission of the non-prosecution agreement into which

that the current [party's] representation `may be inadequate,' and the burden for making such a showing is 'minimal.'" Id. (emphasis added), quoting Clark v. Putnam County, 168 F.3d 458, 461 (11th Cir. 1999). See, e.g., Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 302 F.3d 1242, 1255 (11th Cir. 2002)("The propose

ion to dismiss, satisfies the timeliness requirement for intervention, both as of right and permissive. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. Mr. Epstein unquestionably has an interest in opposing rescission of the non-prosecution agreement into which

hat the current [party's] representation `may be inadequate,' and the burden for making such a showing is `minimal."' Id. (emphasis added), quoting Clark v. Putnam County, 168 F.3d 458, 461 (11th Cir. 1999). See, e.g., Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 302 F.3d 1242, 1255 (11th Cir. 2002)("The propose

l be denied the opportunity to seek to protect his private interests in the matter. See Section infra. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. "Maintaining the confidentiality of grand jury proceedings protects several important interests of the govern