Epstein Secrets

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2255 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when, after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement. we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of I restitution fun

d. Needless to say. we were elisi alarmed that Ms. would attempt to influence the settlement process on such improper grounds. And even alter the IJSAO conceded that it was inappropriate for its attorneys to select the attorney representative. Ms. Villafana continued to improperly lobby for Mr. Ocar

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2235 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when. after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement. we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of restitution fund:

tified individuals, raises cause Ibr concern as to the nature of all conununications that are made to the 'victims.' You previously stated that the IJSAO's main objective with respect to the Section 2255 component of the Agreement was to -place the victims in the same position as they would have been

d victims could recover. Our objections regarding the Section 2255 component of the Agreement began as early as August 2 when. after receiving the LISAO's proposed Non-Prosecution Agreement, we suggested that the 2255 component of the Agreement could be satisfied by the creation of tt restitution fu

but based on the belief that a guardian ad litem would not be appropriate lbr adults that are capable of making their own decisions. Ilowever. the IJSAO included into the Agreement that we pay Ibr the attorney representative -- when originally Ms. Villafana stated that the representative could he paid