Epstein Secrets

rt) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04/23/2009 89 RESPONSE in Opposition re 22 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 62 Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 4. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/23/2009) 04/27,2009 90 ORDER Granting 22 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Memoranda re 20 Response to Motion to

thout knowledge and deny. 2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy'. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to

rt) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04/23/2009 M RESPONSE in Opposition re 5.7 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 5Q Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 3. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/23/2009) 04/27/2009 75 MEMORANDUM in Support re 5$ MOTION for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions of Jane doe No. 3, Mot

thout knowledge and deny. 6. As to the allegations in paragraphs 6, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy'. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to

rt) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04/23/2009 77 RESPONSE in Opposition re a Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 0.0 Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 5. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/23/2009) 04/28/2009 78 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why cases should not be consolidated for discovery purposes Show Cause Response due by 5

thout knowledge and deny. 2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); (Viallov I. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies

57 Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support by Jane Doe. (Mermelstein, Stuart) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04/23/2009 82 RESPONSE in Opposition re 65 Defendant's MOTION to Stay re 5.6 Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe. (Mermels

thout knowledge and deny. 6. As to the allegations in paragraphs 6, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi I. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41h DCA 1983); Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to