Epstein Secrets

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00799516 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Pa

recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00795192 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Pa

recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00081037 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Pa

recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gimbel!, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00208844 • An order from this Court directing an appropriate supervisor from the U.

recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20