Epstein Secrets

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Fla. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availabl

overnment defendant] moots the claim.'" Bankshot Billiards, Inc... City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)). 31 EFTA00205654 how the prosecutors [in those other districts] would prosecute E

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availab

vernment defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)). 31 EFTA00799525 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 0

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availab

vernment defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)). 31 EFTA00208853 how the prosecutors [in those other districts] would prosecute

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Fla. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availa

vernment defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)). 31 EFTA00081046 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 0

e estoppel precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes."); Rood Co. v. Bd. of Public Instruction of Dade County, 102 So. 2d 139, 141-42 (Ha. 1958) (holding that rescission/cancellation of an agreement is not availab

vernment defendant] moots the claim."' Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala, 634 F.3d 1340, 1351 (11th Cir. 2011) (alteration by court; quoting Beta Upsilon Chi Upsilon Chapter v. Machen, 586 F.3d 908, 917 (11th Cir. 2009)). 31 EFTA00795201 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 0