Epstein Secrets

Where is a presumption of adequate representation where an existing party seeks the same objectives as 5 EFTA00209268 the interveners," Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305, 1311 (11th Cir. 2004), that presumption is a "weak" one, id.;"[i]nterveners need only show that the current [party's] representatio

denied the opportunity to seek to protect his private interests in the matter. See Section I(B), infra. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. Maintaining the confidentiality of grand jury proceedings protects several important interests of the governm

uit has said that "Where is a presumption of adequate representation where an existing party seeks the same objectives as the interveners," Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305, 1311 (11th Cir. 2004), that presumption is a "weak" one, id.;"[i]nterveners need only show that the current [party's) representatio

ion to dismiss, satisfies the timeliness requirement for intervention, both as of right and permissive. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. Mr. Epstein unquestionably has an interest in opposing rescission of the non-prosecution agreement into which

t has said that "[t]here is a presumption of adequate representation where an existing party seeks the same objectives as the interveners," Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305, 1311 (11th Cir. 2004), that presumption is a "weak" one, id.;"[i]nterveners need only show that the current [party's] representatio

ion to dismiss, satisfies the timeliness requirement for intervention, both as of right and permissive. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. Mr. Epstein unquestionably has an interest in opposing rescission of the non-prosecution agreement into which

]here is a presumption of adequate representation where an existing party seeks the same objectives as 4 EFTA00584631 the interveners," Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305, 1311 (1 1 th Cir. 2004), that presumption is a "weak" one, id.;"[i]nterveners need only show that the current [party's] representat

l be denied the opportunity to seek to protect his private interests in the matter. See Section infra. B. Mr. Epstein Has an Interest Relating to the Property or Transaction Which Is the Subject Matter of the Action. "Maintaining the confidentiality of grand jury proceedings protects several important interests of the govern