Epstein Secrets

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00644730 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016

nt 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 8 of 10 motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,; and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co. v. Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "ju

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00211535 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016

nt 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 8 of 10 motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,; and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co... Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "jud

district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court. Doe No. 1, supra, 749 F.3d 999. Thus, Eps

d permission to intervene, the press then filed their motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,' and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co.. Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "judi