ow the procedures set out in the Bankruptcy Rules. Before such a dismissal occurs, a district court must consider six factors outlined in Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. In Poulis, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit stated that a district court must balance the following factors: (1) the ext

ound and reaching an alternative, out-of court resolution of their dispute. The case that prompted the Court's inquiry during the status conference, State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.l Hood, 266 F.R.D. 135 (S.D. Miss. 2010) ("State Farm I"), is consistent with these Rules and cases. In State Farm 1, members of the pr

procedures, which are meant to assist the parties in finding common ground. The case that prompted the Court's inquiry during the status conference, State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.l Hood, 266 F.R.D. 135 (S.D. Miss. 2010) ("State Farm I"), is consistent with these Rules and cases. In State Farm I, members of the pr

ound and reaching an alternative, out-of court resolution of their dispute. The case that prompted the Court's inquiry during the status conference, State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Hood, 266 F.R.D. 135 (S.D. Miss. 2010) ("State Farm I"), is consistent with these Rules and cases. In State Farm 1, members of the

ow the procedures set out in the Bankruptcy Rules. Before such a dismissal occurs, a district court must consider six factors outlined in Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. In Poulis, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit stated that a district court must balance the following factors: (1) the ext

189 Fed. Appx. 93, at *96 (3d Cir. 2006). Before such a dismissal occurs, however, a district court must consider six factors outlined in Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0053285 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00199469 EFTA01363327