Epstein Secrets

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00644730 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016

ound and reaching an alternative, out-of court resolution of their dispute. The case that prompted the Court's inquiry during the status conference, State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Hood, 266 F.R.D. 135 (S.D. Miss. 2010) ("State Farm I"), is consistent with these Rules and cases. In State Farm 1, members of the

istrict court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI 59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The 3 EFTA00211535 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016

ound and reaching an alternative, out-of court resolution of their dispute. The case that prompted the Court's inquiry during the status conference, State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.l Hood, 266 F.R.D. 135 (S.D. Miss. 2010) ("State Farm I"), is consistent with these Rules and cases. In State Farm 1, members of the pr

district court granted the motion and allowed Epstein to seek a protective order (DEI59). Epstein's motion for protective order (DE162) was denied (DEI 88), and Epstein appealed along with his attorneys (DE195). The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court. Doe No. 1, supra, 749 F.3d 999. Thus, Eps

procedures, which are meant to assist the parties in finding common ground. The case that prompted the Court's inquiry during the status conference, State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.l Hood, 266 F.R.D. 135 (S.D. Miss. 2010) ("State Farm I"), is consistent with these Rules and cases. In State Farm I, members of the pr