3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 5
Mentions
this is the probability that a newly introduced mutant, using a different strategy, takes over the population (Nowak et al 2004, Taylor et al 2004, Imhof Sc Nowak 2006, Nowak 2006a, Traulsen et al 2006, Lessard Sc Ladret 2007, Bomze & Pawlowitsch 2008). In this new approach, the Nash equilibrium cond
ho-interacts-with-whom changes during the evolutionary process (Fig 2.2). For mathematical convenience we con- sider evolutionary game dynamics in a Wright-Fisher process with constant population size [63]. A frequency dependent Moran process [110] or a pairwise comparison process [156], which is more realist
t in common, they interact several times. An interaction is given by the usual payoff matrix. The system evolves according to synchronous updating (Wright-Fisher process). There are discrete, non-overlapping generations. All individuals update at the same time. The population size is constant. Individuals re
equivalent to PA C 1/N, where PA is the fixation probability of an A mutant in a population of B individuals (Nowak et al 2004a, Ohtsuki et al 2007, Imhof et al 2006, Lessard and Ladret 2007). The above condition can thus be interpreted as follows: in a 2 x 2 game with mixed strategies, pure strategy
Evolutionary updating occurs according to the frequency dependent Moran process (Nowak et al, 2004; Taylor et al, 2004) or the frequency dependent Wright-Fisher process (Imhof & Nowak, 2006). Reproduction is proportional to fitness and subject to a mutation rate u. With probability 1 — u the offspring inheri
A., 2005. Evolutionary cycles of coop- eration and defection. PNAS, 102, 1079710800. [63] Imhof LA, Nowak MA, 2006. Evolutionary game dynamics in a Wright-Fisher process. J. Math. Biol 52, 667-681. [64] Jansen VA, van Baalen M, 2006. Altruism through beard chromodynkunics. Nature, 440, 663-666. [65] Kandor
for Archaeological Research/University of Cambridge, 119-129. 116. Foster KR (2006). The Phoenix effect. Nature 441: 291-292. 117. Fudenberg D, LA Imhof (2006). Imitation processes with small mutations. J Econ Theory 131: 251-262. 118. Fudenberg D, MA Nowak, C Taylor, LA Imhof (2006). Evolutionary g
nergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas. I theor Biol 239: 195-202. 125. Imhof LA, MA Nowak (2006). Evolutionary game dynamics in a Wright-Fisher process. Math Biol 52: 667-681. 126. Iwasa Y, MA Nowak, F Michor (2006). Evolution of resistance during clonal expansion. Genetics 172: 2557-2566.
Entities connected to both Imhof and Wright-Fisher

George W. Bush
PERSONCourtney Wild
PERSON
Morgan Stanley
ORGANIZATIONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Lieberman
PERSONTraulsen
PERSONEvolutionary Dynamics
ORGANIZATION
Martin Nowak
PERSONNowak MA
PERSONSantos FC
LOCATION
Hawks
PERSONHofbauer
ORGANIZATION
Prisoner
PERSONSasaki
PERSONDurrett
PERSONKomarova
PERSONJon Schaffer
PERSONPacheco
PERSONDoebeli M
ORGANIZATIONOhtsuki H
ORGANIZATION