Epstein Secrets

E BY DENTS (907L AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVEORDER 14 end of it. 13 14 15 ($19) August 4, 2010 15 16 MR. FARMER: Good morning, your Honor. Gary Fanner on behalf of LM, Brad Edwards, and 16 17 the Fanner Jaffe Wasting law firm. We are an 17 TN show-asdard ass came on for 18 interested party and

, Document 685, have a 20 protective order that was entered with Mr. Schera's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on. 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the case with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is

E BY DENTS (907L AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVEORDER 14 end of it. 13 14 15 ($19) August 4, 2010 15 16 MR. FARMER: Good morning, your Honor. Gary Fanner on behalf of LM, Brad Edwards, and 16 17 the Fanner Jaffe Wasting law firm. We are an 17 TN show-asdard ass came on for 18 interested party and

, Document 685, have a 20 protective order that was entered with Mr. Schera's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on. 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the case with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is

BY DB0672 (S07), AMENDED MOTION FOR PROTL'CTIVE ORDER 14 end of It. 13 (SIR) 15 MR. FARMER: Good morning, your HOME 14 15 August 4,2010 16 Gary Fanner on behalf of LM, Brad Edwards, and I6 17 the Fanner Jaffe Wasting law firm. We are an 17 The ahow-cndaal ass mit on for 18 interested party and

Document 685, have a 20 protective ceder that was entered with Mr. Scherer's 21 clients. We have, as an example, Document 715 that 22 pertains to MS Capital, and on and on 23 So, in any event, what we realized is 24 the cue with respect to the Epstein vs. Scott 25 Rothstein, Bradley Edwards case, is t