Epstein Secrets

scovery in civil cases must be relevant to subject matter of case and must be admissible or reason- ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(bX1). [2) Pretrial Procedure 307A te=031 307A Pretrial Procedure 307A11 Depositions and Discovery 307A11(A) Discovery in Ge

07Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel dis- covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certior- ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, .1., held that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their revenues relating to such activities was dis- coverable. Petition de

scovery in civil cases must be relevant to subject matter of case and must be admissible or reason- ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule I .280(b)(1). [2) Pretrial Procedure 307A €=.31 307A Pretrial Procedure 307A11 Depositions and Discovery 307A11(A) Discovery in G

07Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel dis- covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certior- ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, J., held that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their revenues relating to such activities was dis- coverable. Petition den

fter prevailing on summary judgment; settlement proposal was limited to claims against hospital and did not limit recovery against third parties. West's F.S.A. § 768.79; West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.442. Cases that cite this headnote Attorneys and Law Firms *815 John W. Kearns, Coral Gables, for appel

d attorney fees and costs to hospital based on its having made a settlement proposal to patient that was not accepted. Patient appealed. Holding: The District Court of Appeal, Ramirez, J., held that settlement proposal was not ambiguous as to whether it extinguished any of patient's claims against other parties. Affirm

l for settlement under offer of judgment rule with particularity, either within the body of the proposal or by attaching the form of the release. West's F.S.A. § 768.79. Cases that cite this headnote Attorneys and Law Firms *422 Marlene S. Reiss of Marlene S. Reiss, P.A., Miami, for appellant. Ed

ial, the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Edward H. Fine, J., entered judgment in favor of patron. Store appealed. (Holding:) The District Court of Appeal, Streitfeld, Jeffrey R., Associate Judge, held that store was liable for patron's attorney fees on the basis of offer of judgment rule. Reversed