07Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel dis- covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certior- ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, .1., held that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their revenues relating to such activities was dis- coverable. Petition de

07Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel dis- covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certior- ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, J., held that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their revenues relating to such activities was dis- coverable. Petition den

ed husband's motion to dismiss the action as barred by the absolute litigation privilege. Husband filed petition for writ of certiorari. Holdings: The District Court of Appeal, Swanson, J., held that: ill allegedly defamatory statements had some relation to the divorce proceeding and, thus, were absolutely privileged, a

:for pule County, Man FL roans,..2d SERIFS ,.. • • Schwartz, J., of burglary, robbery, attempt- ed murder and grand larceny, and he ap- pealed. The District Court of Appeal held that evidence that defendant and accom. plies gained •entry through trickery rather than breaking and entering did not proecnt reversible er

oe County, David J. Audlin, Jr., J., granted attorneys' and law firm's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff partner appealed. Holdings: The District Court of Appeal, Rothenberg, J., held that: III litigation privilege barred the abuse of process claim, and (21 litigation privilege bared the malicious prosecut

d attorney fees and costs to hospital based on its having made a settlement proposal to patient that was not accepted. Patient appealed. Holding: The District Court of Appeal, Ramirez, J., held that settlement proposal was not ambiguous as to whether it extinguished any of patient's claims against other parties. Affirm

Palm Beach County, Elizabeth T. Maass, J., found for university, and the court denied university's motion for attorney fees. University appealed. The District Court of Appeal, Hazouri, J., held that university was entitled to award of attorney fees on basis of students' rejection of settlement proposal. Reversed and rem

ial, the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Edward H. Fine, J., entered judgment in favor of patron. Store appealed. (Holding:) The District Court of Appeal, Streitfeld, Jeffrey R., Associate Judge, held that store was liable for patron's attorney fees on the basis of offer of judgment rule. Reversed