Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both New York District and the Facts Cited Therein
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON15 w/ New·4 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON13 w/ New·4 w/ the
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON10 w/ New·4 w/ the
New York
LOCATION10 w/ New·4 w/ the
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION10 w/ New·3 w/ the
Felony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATION8 w/ New·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON8 w/ New·4 w/ the
Palo Alto
LOCATION9 w/ New·2 w/ the
Shanghai
LOCATION9 w/ New·2 w/ the
Palm Beach Police
ORGANIZATION6 w/ New·4 w/ the
JR
Joe Recarey
PERSON7 w/ New·3 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON6 w/ New·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON5 w/ New·4 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION5 w/ New·4 w/ the
MW
M. Weinberg
PERSON5 w/ New·4 w/ the
Sex Crimes Unit
ORGANIZATION7 w/ New·2 w/ the
V.I.C.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ New·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ New·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON5 w/ New·4 w/ the
Eldridge
PERSON4 w/ New·4 w/ the