Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
d an individual facing such a risk classification a constitutionally- mandated minimum level of due process. Doe, 3 F. Supp. 2d at 469, 471 (citing Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 662 A.2d 367 (1995)). While "the due process protections required for a risk level classification proceeding are not as extensive as t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
d an individual facing such a risk classification a constitutionally- mandated minimum level of due process. Doe, 3 F. Supp. 2d at 469, 471 (citing Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 662 A.2d 367 (1995)). While "the due process protections required for a risk level classification proceeding are not as extensive as t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
d an individual facing such a risk classification a constitutionally- mandated minimum level of due process. Doe, 3 F. Supp. 2d at 469, 471 (citing Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 662 A.2d 367 (1995)). While "the due process protections required for a risk level classification proceeding are not as extensive as t
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
orney The SORA hearing, originally scheduled for September 15, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions
d an individual facing such a risk classification a constitutionally- mandated minimum level of due process. Doe, 3 F. Supp. 2d at 469, 471 (citing Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 662 A.2d 367 (1995)). While "the due process protections required for a risk level classification proceeding are not as extensive as t
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both New York District and Doe v. Poritz
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON15 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON13 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON10 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
New York
LOCATION10 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION10 w/ New·3 w/ Doe
Felony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATION8 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON8 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Palo Alto
LOCATION9 w/ New·2 w/ Doe
Shanghai
LOCATION9 w/ New·2 w/ Doe
Palm Beach Police
ORGANIZATION6 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
JR
Joe Recarey
PERSON7 w/ New·3 w/ Doe
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON6 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON5 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION5 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
MW
M. Weinberg
PERSON5 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Sex Crimes Unit
ORGANIZATION7 w/ New·2 w/ Doe
V.I.C.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
George W. Bush
PERSON5 w/ New·4 w/ Doe
Eldridge
PERSON4 w/ New·4 w/ Doe