Epstein Secrets

nate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes S. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes I_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a ma

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 1 I: IS. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and no

case originate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to (1 1,,2003.> Yes S. No this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to 11, 1999? _ Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No Does this case originate from a matter pend

ut merit and frivoh • 17. Tha, presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these + funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not subje

e from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? _ Yes _X_. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1,1999? Yes _X_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a matter

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds arc hereby frozen and not

te from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to April 1, 2003? _ Yes —IL_ No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes .X___. No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? Yes No 9. Does this case originate from a matte

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11; 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not