Epstein Secrets

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes __X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the V.S. Attorney's Of

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 1 I: IS. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and no

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? _ Yes __X__ No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's O

ut merit and frivoh • 17. Tha, presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these + funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not subje

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes _X— No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds arc hereby frozen and not

he Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X._ No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11; 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not