5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
loyer pension plans and withdrawal liability from union-sponsored multiemployer pension plans. In July 2013, the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the portfolio company management activities of a private equity fund could cause the fund to be regarded for ERISA controlled group lia
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
loyer pension plans and withdrawal liability from union-sponsored multiemployer pension plans. In July 2013, the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the portfolio company management activities of a private equity fund could cause the fund to be regarded for ERISA controlled group lia
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
loyer pension plans and withdrawal liability from union-sponsored multiemployer pension plans. In July 2013, the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the portfolio company management activities of a private equity fund could cause the fund to be regarded for ERISA controlled group lia
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
loyer pension plans and withdrawal liability from union-sponsored multiemployer pension plans. In July 2013, the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the portfolio company management activities of a private equity fund could cause the fund to be regarded for ERISA controlled group lia
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
loyer pension plans and withdrawal liability from union-sponsored multiemployer pension plans. In July 2013, the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the portfolio company management activities of a private equity fund could cause the fund to be regarded for ERISA controlled group lia
ties Act, (y) a "qualified purchaser" as defined in Section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act and (z) a "qualified client," as defined in the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"). There is no public market for the Interests, and no such market is expected to develop in t
Entities connected to both the First Circuit and U.S. Investment

United States District Court
ORGANIZATIONthe U.S. Investment Company Act
ORGANIZATION
European Union
ORGANIZATIONiCapital Advisors
ORGANIZATIONGlendower
LOCATIONthe District of Massachusetts
LOCATIONInvestment Concentration
ORGANIZATIONThe Confidential Private Placement Memorandum
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
United Kingdom
LOCATIONCayman
LOCATIONKeogh
ORGANIZATION
Paul Volcker
PERSON
Puerto Rico
LOCATION
Eric Holder
PERSONCalder
ORGANIZATION
Marla Maples
PERSON
Luxembourg
LOCATION
Latvia
LOCATION
Slovenia
LOCATION