areer, this dynamic work is a striking example of Calder’s iconic mobiles and his keen attention to scale,

ttended the Art Students League in New York City, Calder had a strong bond with Europe and its artistic se

e Atlantic and even setting up studios in France, Calder interacted with luminaries of the European avant-

ne and biomorphic forms. Léger would often attend Calder’s circus performances in Paris and the two would

reate their greatest works. For example, Miró and Calder's legendary friendship was bolstered by a mutual

minimum contacts existed since dispute arose from a contract with substantial con- tacts with the forum) (internal quotations and citations omitted); Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 789, 104 S.Ct. 1482, 79 L.Ed.2d 804 (1984) (finding personal juris- diction appropriate over non-resident de- fendants who “e

tates. Accordingly, Plaintiffs may rely on their “purposefully directed” theory to establish these mini- mum contacts. But as existed in Burger King, Calder, and the three terrorism cases, Plaintiffs must allege some personal or direct involvement by the Defendants in the conduct giving rise to their clai

ch Blackwell Iredale & Yoo Jones Day Kaplan Hecker Kirkland & Ellis Kramer Levin Latham & Watkins Levene Neale Lowenstein Sandler Maples and Calder Margulies Faith Mayer Brown Milbank LLP Milberg Coleman Moses & Singer Napoli Shkolnik Norton Rose One Essex Court Orrick Herrington Otterb

nt took ‘intentional * * * tortious, actions’ and ‘knew that the brunt of th[e] injury would be felt’ in the *15 foreign forum.” Jd. at *19, (quoting Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783, 789-790 (1984)). Even so, the United States argued that the questions presented by the Petition did not warrant review by the

. | said that a gallery carried little to no risk on the sales tax side, but | reminded him that he had not wanted to use a gallery last year for the Calder because of confidentiality reasons. He said to use the same exchange agent as before, which made sense to me because he was extremely concerned about

. I said that a gallery carried little to no risk on the sales tax side, but I reminded him that he had not wanted to use a gallery last year for the Calder because of confidentiality reasons. He said to use the same exchange agent as before, which made sense to me because he was extremely concerned about