What is the District of Massachusetts in the Epstein files?

The District of Massachusetts appears in a document referencing a legal precedent set by a judge in that district. It is a United States district court whose territorial jurisdiction is the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Why is the District of Massachusetts mentioned in the context of Jeffrey Epstein?

The mention appears to be related to a legal argument where a precedent from the District of Massachusetts is being cited. It's not clear from the available snippet how this directly relates to Epstein's case.

What kind of cases does the District of Massachusetts handle?

The United States Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts represents the United States in civil and criminal litigation in the courts. The court has three divisions: Eastern, Central, and Western, hearing cases in Boston, Worcester, and Springfield, respectively.

What is the District of Massachusetts in the Epstein files?

The District of Massachusetts appears in a document referencing a legal precedent set by a judge in that district. It is a United States district court whose territorial jurisdiction is the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Why is the District of Massachusetts mentioned in the context of Jeffrey Epstein?

The mention appears to be related to a legal argument where a precedent from the District of Massachusetts is being cited. It's not clear from the available snippet how this directly relates to Epstein's case.

What kind of cases does the District of Massachusetts handle?

The United States Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts represents the United States in civil and criminal litigation in the courts. The court has three divisions: Eastern, Central, and Western, hearing cases in Boston, Worcester, and Springfield, respectively.

Back to People & Entities

the District of Massachusetts

Location

Total Mentions

Documents

Connected Entities

The District of Massachusetts is mentioned in the context of a legal precedent cited in a court document.

The District of Massachusetts appears in a court document where the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, is mentioned as a precedent. This suggests the document may be related to legal proceedings or arguments where precedents from that district are relevant. However, without further context, the specific nature of the connection to the Epstein case is unclear.

Key Highlights

•The District of Massachusetts is referenced in a court document as a legal precedent.
•Judge Wolf, the Chief Judge at the time, is specifically mentioned.
•The context suggests a legal argument or proceeding, but the direct relevance to Epstein is not evident from the snippet alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

Document Mentions (2)

171.pdf

DOJ-FL-HOLD-171

Source: DOJ First Production

1 mention

add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a

EFTA00019994 - EFTA00020079

1 mention

judgment with his own independent investigation. THE COURT: OK. MR. WEINBERG: If I could just add one precedent, your Honor. The Chief judge in the District of Massachusetts or the Chief Judge at the time, Judge Wolf, in a case called U.S. v. Fleming, when the conditions at Walpole, which is a state prison where federa

Page: EFTA00020020 →