Epstein Secrets

ndividuals for whom the United States believes it has proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them w in enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney used similar language in tying the names "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, sec December 6, 2007 letter from

well as actual transcripts, the strategy or direction of the investigation, the deliberations or questions of jurors, and the like.") (citing JaLe Dow Jones & Co., Inc„ 142 F.3d 496, 500 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); Les also SEC Dresser Indust', Ms , 628 F.2d 1368, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1980); Fund for Constitutional Gov't a

whom the United States believes it has proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them was a victim of an enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman used similar language in tying the names of the "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see Decembe

as well as actual transcripts, the strategy or direction of the investigation, the deliberations or questions of jurors, and t like.") (citing Dug Dow Jones & Co., Inc„ 142 F.3d 496, 500 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); see also SEC Dresser Indust. la, 628 F.2d 1368, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1980); Fund for Constitutional Gov't Nat'

whom the United States believes it has proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them was a victim of an enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman used similar language in tying the names of the "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see Decembe

well as actual transcripts, the strategy or direction of the investigation, the deliberations or questions of jurors, and the like.") (citing In.m Dow Jones & Co., Inc.„, 142 F.3d 496, 500 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); see SEC v Dresser Indust'. Inc., 628 F.2d 1368, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1980); Fund for Constitutional Gov't v

ed victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense ns a courtesy. in addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771

ve disclosures of grand jury material, "Rule 6(e) does not create a type of secrecy which is waived once public disclosure occurs." In re Motions of Dow Jones & Co., 142 F.3d 496, 505 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting In re North, 16 F.3d 1234, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1994)). "[Elven if material concerning the grand jury inves

viduals for whom the United States believes it has proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them w v n enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney used similar language in tying the names ', victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see December 6, 2007 letter fr

well as actual transcripts, the strategy or direction of the investigation, the deliberations or questions of jurors, and the like.") (citing in re Dow Jones & Co., Inc„ 142 F.3d 496, 500 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); sce alsq SEC v Dresser hglustr, inc„ 628 F.2d 1368, 1382 (D.C. Cir. 1980); fund for Constitutional Gov't