Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
courthouse, were drawn from Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Id. at 24. The defendant argued that the district court erred by selecting the jury from the "Long Island Division" wheel because there was under-representation of Blacks and Hispanics in that "division" as compared to the Eastern District as a whole. Id. at 23-
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
courthouse, were drawn from Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Id. at 24. The defendant argued that the district court erred by selecting the jury from the "Long Island Division" wheel because there was under-representation of Blacks and Hispanics in that "division" as compared to the Eastern District as a whole. Id. at 23-
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
courthouse, were drawn from Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Id. at 24. The defendant argued that the district court erred by selecting the jury from the "Long Island Division" wheel because there was under-representation of Blacks and Hispanics in that "division" as compared to the Eastern District as a whole. Id. at 23-
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
courthouse, were drawn from Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Id. at 24. The defendant argued that the district court erred by selecting the jury from the "Long Island Division" wheel because there was under-representation of Blacks and Hispanics in that "division" as compared to the Eastern District as a whole. Id. at 23-
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (121)
Entities connected to both Cir.2010 and the "Long Island Division
United States
LOCATION8 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Torres
PERSON6 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
John F. Kennedy
PERSON6 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Rivera
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
MA
Mahabub
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Florence
LOCATION5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
JI
Jimenez
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
TH
Thompson
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Bronx
LOCATION5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
WA
Walsh
PERSON5 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Queens
LOCATION4 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the
Jencks
PERSON4 w/ Cir.2010·5 w/ the