Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
under Rule 16 or by any means other than the Jencks Act. See In re U.S., 834 F.2d 283, 284-87 (2d Cir. 1987) (issuing a writ of mandamus reversing District Court's order directing the Government "to produce all oral statement made by the defendants and coconspirators that the Government planned to offer at tri
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
under Rule 16 or by any means other than the Jencks Act. See In re U.S., 834 F.2d 283, 284-87 (2d Cir. 1987) (issuing a writ of mandamus reversing District Court's order directing the Government "to produce all oral statement made by the defendants and coconspirators that the Government planned to offer at tri
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
under Rule 16 or by any means other than the Jencks Act. See In re U.S., 834 F.2d 283, 284-87 (2d Cir. 1987) (issuing a writ of mandamus reversing District Court's order directing the Government "to produce all oral statement made by the defendants and coconspirators that the Government planned to offer at tri
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
under Rule 16 or by any means other than the Jencks Act. See In re U.S., 834 F.2d 283, 284-87 (2d Cir. 1987) (issuing a writ of mandamus reversing District Court's order directing the Government "to produce all oral statement made by the defendants and coconspirators that the Government planned to offer at tri
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (126)
Entities connected to both District Court's and Cir.2010
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ District·8 w/ Cir.2010
United States
LOCATION7 w/ District·8 w/ Cir.2010
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION7 w/ District·6 w/ Cir.2010
John F. Kennedy
PERSON7 w/ District·6 w/ Cir.2010
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION7 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Torres
PERSON6 w/ District·6 w/ Cir.2010
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ District·6 w/ Cir.2010
LB
Leon Black
PERSON6 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Rivera
PERSON5 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Tranquillo
LOCATION6 w/ District·4 w/ Cir.2010
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON5 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
MA
Mahabub
PERSON5 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Barneys New York
ORGANIZATION6 w/ District·4 w/ Cir.2010
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON6 w/ District·4 w/ Cir.2010
WA
Walsh
PERSON5 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Bill Richardson
PERSON5 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Florence
LOCATION5 w/ District·5 w/ Cir.2010
Jencks
PERSON6 w/ District·4 w/ Cir.2010
GE
Geaney
PERSON6 w/ District·4 w/ Cir.2010