Epstein Secrets

United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014) 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 7 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 7 Mann Act passim Other Authorities Fed. R. Evid. 401 12 Fed. R. Evid. 402 11, 12 Fed. R. Evid. 403 passim Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim Fed. R. Evid

the conspiratorial agreement" is the key to determining whether "an overt act may properly be regarded as in furtherance of the conspiracy" (quoting Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 397 (1957)). In its opposition to Ms. Maxwell's motion to strike, the government argued that because a conspiracy "does not require

with Jeffrey Epstein that would violate N.Y. Penal Law § 130.55. Indictment¶¶ 13, 19. The indictment does not charge Ms. Maxwell with a substantive Mann Act violation as to any individual other than Accuser-1, nor does it allege that Ms. Maxwell personally enticed or caused any person other than Accuser-

Salmonese, 352 F.3d 608 (2d Cir. 2003) s See Motion to Dismiss Counts One Through Four of the Indictment as Time-Barred. 7 EFTA00086746 (quoting Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 397 (1957)). Thus, whether Ms. Maxwell's alleged conduct with respect to Minor Victim-3 constituted an overt act in furtherance of th

United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014) 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 7 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 7 Mann Act passim Other Authorities Fed. R. Evid. 401 12 Fed. R. Evid. 402 11, 12 Fed. R. Evid. 403 passim Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim Fed. R. Evid

the conspiratorial agreement" is the key to determining whether "an overt act may properly be regarded as in furtherance of the conspiracy" (quoting Grunewald v. United States, 353 U.S. 391, 397 (1957)). In its opposition to Ms. Maxwell's motion to strike, the government argued that because a conspiracy "does not require