Epstein Secrets

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

0330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 25 of 34 counsel testify on her behalf on the perjury charges and having them assist her in defending the Mann Act charges. The Second Circuit has recognized that witness testimony offered by a party's attorney presents serious risks to the fairness of a trial.