Epstein Secrets

o make a statement under oath at the state sentencing."' 81. On November 28, 2007, Lefkowitz sent an email to U.S. Attorney Acosta (with a copy to AUSA Sloman) objecting to victim notifications: We do, however, strongly and emphatically object to your sending a letter to the alleged victims. Finally, we d

otification Letter. You write that you don't understand the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the `Justice for All Act of 2004,' crime victims are entitled to: 'The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding ... involving the cri

under oath at the state sentencing." See DE 361, Statement of Undisputed Fact 80 (not disputed by the Government). Similarly, on December 6, 2007, AUSA Sloman sent a letter to Epstein's defense counsel that explained: Finally, let me address your objections to the draft Victim Notification Letter. You wr

otification Letter. You write that you don't understand the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the `Justice for All Act of 2004,' crime victims are entitled to: `The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding ... involving the cri

o make a statement under oath at the state sentencing."' 81. On November 28, 2007, Lefkowitz sent an email to U.S. Attorney Acosta (with a copy to AUSA Sloman) objecting to victim notifications: We do, however, strongly and emphatically object to your sending a letter to the alleged victims. Finally, we d

otification Letter. You write that you don't understand the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the `Justice for All Act of 2004,' crime victims are entitled to: 'The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding ... involving the cri