Epstein Secrets

OetA) rfuCate rmr9 e. or- r:le, [Nader ,E35 IvA.5 N155; in Awl° Co r r Ire° , Pile-s. EFTA00175428 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 101, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPST

s a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v, Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000)• Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also

con I woAae.l•lo ORA al AIM EFTA00184424 Case 8:21tivagl-Mg4 Kjaacument 361-30 _Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 12 of uocument .0;zred on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 11 of 27 she would return to the United States to testify. Terrified by Defendant's demonstrated ability to track her down on her c

y representative, and not from the Government, to avoid any bias. As you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the section 2255 component of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take p

onnection with a non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreement. RFP MIA 000030 EFTA00184896 lase 9Y/61:CA5736-KAM Document 362-17 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 P ggveorian 14 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP December 1 I. 2007 Page 7 Mr, Epstein's blanket waiver of liability as to civil claims gives the a

by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Stan has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of the Agreement. We are hopeful that this meeting will take place as