Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n letter to me. This was the first written communication I had received from the FBI. The letter was attached as Exhibit 1 to my earlier statement." D.E. 310- 1, 1 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Offi
on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County to various similar state offenses including solicitation of minors for prostitution." D.E. 1,1 2. Once they received the non-prosecution Jane Doe No. 3, who seeks to be added as a party, also wasted little time in utilizing the non- prosec
at this brief phone conversation was not a proper notification of her rights under the CVRA. D.E. 311 at 17-18. The Government never suggested that S/A Slater's phone conversation with Jane Doe No. 3, in January — February 2007, constituted compliance with notifying her of her rights under II Government Ex
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n letter to me. This was the first written communication I had received from the FBI. The letter was attached as Exhibit 1 to my earlier statement." D.E. 310- 1, ¶ 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Offi
at this brief phone conversation was not a proper notification of her rights under the CVRA. D.E. 311 at 17-18. The Government never suggested that S/A Slater's phone conversation with Jane Doe No. 3, in January — February 2007, constituted compliance with notifying her of her rights under the CVRA. Agent S
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
FBI's investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. She told S/A Slater that she did not want to be bothered about the Epstein matter again. D.E. 304-1, ¶ 7 and D.E. 290-3 at 17-18. In their motion, petitioners claim that the facts surrounding this exchange are highly disputed, when they are not. D.E. 311 at 16
at this brief phone conversation was not a proper notification of her rights under the CVRA. D.E. 311 at 17-18. The Government never suggested that S/A Slater's phone conversation with Jane Doe No. 3, in January — February 2007, constituted compliance with notifying her of her rights under the CVRA. Agent S
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (70)
Entities connected to both D.E. and S/A Slater's
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON47 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON38 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
Kenneth Marra
PERSON38 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
Bradley Edwards
PERSON33 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON33 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
Paul Cassell
PERSON19 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
JS
Jack Scarola
PERSON17 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
United States
LOCATION16 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON15 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
the Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION11 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION10 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
LB
Leon Black
PERSON10 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
Weissing
PERSON9 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
Alexander Acosta
PERSON8 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON7 w/ D.E.·2 w/ S/A
RJ
Robert C. Josefsberg
PERSON5 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
RB
Roy Black
PERSON5 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
Podhurst Orseck
ORGANIZATION5 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ D.E.·3 w/ S/A
the Circuit Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ D.E.·2 w/ S/A