Epstein Secrets

/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (D.E. #214). Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to this matter and being otherwise duly advised in the premises it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUD

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 218 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2010 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs.

AUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff Jane Doe No.2's Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena and for Order of Contempt Against Alfredo Rodriguez (D.E. #469). The time period for filing a response in opposition to the subject Motion has passed and Mr. Rodriguez has elected to not file a response to

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 555 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff,

he arguments raised in Plaintiffs Response In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint in Jane Doe No.1 v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CV-80893, D.E. 31)(Attached hereto as Exhibit "1") and Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay and or Continue Action in Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein (

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/24/2009 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff, VS

/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (D.E. #214). Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to this matter and being otherwise duly advised in the premises it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUD

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 218 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2010 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs.

led a motion to compel the Clerk of Court to enter default against Mr. Epstein, or in the alternative, for an enlargement of time to serve process [D.E. 9].3 Overview of Rules for Service of Process The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize three distinct methods of service in a diversity actio

federal procedure. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(1) permits service to be 2 EFTA00222189 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/13.2008 Page 3 of 11 made according to "state law for serving a summons in . . . the state . . . where service is made" as an alternative to fo

million - - well over the $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction. See Jane Doe No. 2 at D.E. 1 ¶ 4; Jane Doe No. 3 at D.E. I ¶ 4; Jane Doe No. 4 at D.E. 1 ¶ 4; Jane Doe No. 5 at D.E. 1 ¶ 4. 3. There is complete diversity. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete divers

F AMERICA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. EXECUTED ON: , 2008. 11 of 40 EFTA00175491 Case 9:08-c,/,,,811-KAM Doci.....ent 1 EntereA FLSD Docket /2008 Page 12 of 40 STATE COURT PLEADINGS EFTA00175492 Case 9:08-cv-u,./811-11kAM cMtriegå Docket 05,- I/2008 Page 13 of 40 IN THE CIRCUIT