Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ement. See Mazzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a resciss
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ement. See Mazzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a resciss
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ement. See Mazzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a resciss
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ement. See Mazzoni Farms, 761 So. 2d at 313 (concluding that "[a] prerequisite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a resciss
y erroneous construction of 18 U.S.C. § 3858(b) — and where rescission "would [have] restore[d] the defendant to the approximate status quo ante"); Craig v. People, 986 P.2d 951, 959-60, 961-93 (Colo. 1999) (holding that plea agreement made no unlawful promises, but concluding that court would not have been req
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (165)
Entities connected to both First Mortg and Craig v. People
WA
Walker
PERSON4 w/ First·16 w/ Craig
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON4 w/ First·16 w/ Craig
Kenneth Marra
PERSON4 w/ First·16 w/ Craig
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON4 w/ First·16 w/ Craig
GA
Garcia
PERSON4 w/ First·15 w/ Craig
Marc Rich
PERSON4 w/ First·15 w/ Craig
RU
Rubin
PERSON4 w/ First·14 w/ Craig
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON4 w/ First·14 w/ Craig
Bradley Edwards
PERSON4 w/ First·14 w/ Craig
United States
LOCATION4 w/ First·14 w/ Craig
the Southern District
LOCATION4 w/ First·13 w/ Craig
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON5 w/ First·12 w/ Craig
George W. Bush
PERSON5 w/ First·11 w/ Craig
Paul Cassell
PERSON4 w/ First·12 w/ Craig
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION4 w/ First·11 w/ Craig
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION4 w/ First·11 w/ Craig
West Palm Beach
LOCATION4 w/ First·7 w/ Craig
Fifth Circuit
ORGANIZATION4 w/ First·7 w/ Craig
USAO-SDFL
ORGANIZATION4 w/ First·6 w/ Craig
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION3 w/ First·7 w/ Craig