Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
il case. She acknowledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
il case. She acknowledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
il case. She acknowledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC DATE FILED: 6/25/2021 20-cr-330 (AJN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Maxwell moves to s
il case. She acknowledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (40)
Entities connected to both USDC SONY and Pillsbury Co.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON51 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION33 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON30 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
United States
LOCATION25 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
the Southern District
LOCATION21 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION21 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
SA
Salameh
PERSON15 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
Julie K. Brown
PERSON14 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION11 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
Onondaga
LOCATION9 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION8 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
Lugosch
PERSON6 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
David Boies
PERSON5 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON5 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
OP
Orange Prod
PERSON4 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
CS
Conticommodity Servs
PERSON4 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
the Office of the U.S.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
HJ
Harlan, J.
PERSON4 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
MC
McNabb
PERSON4 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury
DM
D. Martindell
PERSON4 w/ USDC·5 w/ Pillsbury