Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
26(a)(1). Although Petitioners have already served their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures (DE 266 at 13), and although this Court has repeatedly held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the general course of this proceeding," the Government maintains that the rule governing initial disclosures in civil litigation d
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
26(a)(1). Although Petitioners have already served their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures (DE 266 at 13), and although this Court has repeatedly held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the general course of this proceeding," the Government maintains that the rule governing initial disclosures in civil litigation d
5 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (1 at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
26(a)(1). Although Petitioners have already served their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures (DE 266 at 13), and although this Court has repeatedly held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the general course of this proceeding," the Government maintains that the rule governing initial disclosures in civil litigation d
at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (a. at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
26(a)(1). Although Petitioners have already served their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures (DE 266 at 13), and although this Court has repeatedly held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the general course of this proceeding," the Government maintains that the rule governing initial disclosures in civil litigation d
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (61)
Entities connected to both the Federal Rules of Civil and The Courts
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON56 w/ the·4 w/ The
United States
LOCATION35 w/ the·4 w/ The
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON34 w/ the·3 w/ The
Kenneth Marra
PERSON29 w/ the·4 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION24 w/ the·4 w/ The
George W. Bush
PERSON15 w/ the·4 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION12 w/ the·4 w/ The
Main Justice
ORGANIZATION11 w/ the·4 w/ The
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ the·3 w/ The
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ The
United States Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION8 w/ the·4 w/ The
Michael Douglas
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ The
The Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION8 w/ the·4 w/ The
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION8 w/ the·4 w/ The
D.C. Cir
ORGANIZATION7 w/ the·4 w/ The
MY
Myers
PERSON8 w/ the·3 w/ The
WA
Wayte
PERSON7 w/ the·4 w/ The
WR
Wright
PERSON7 w/ the·4 w/ The
Initial Disclosures
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·4 w/ The
HI
Hickman
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ The