Epstein Secrets

ments of law when unsealing the nonprosecution agreement because the agreement references federal grand jury proceedings, which are protected under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2). Epstein failed to raise this argument in his motion to make the agreement confidential, (A-13), and he did not demonstrate at th

PSTEIN, CASE NO: 4D09-2554 Petitioner, L.T. No. 20098CF009381A vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Diana L. Martin of the law firm of LEOPOLD—KUVIN, P.A., hereby enters an appearance in the above-styled case as co-counsel of record on behalf of Respondent B.B. (

quire confidentiality) (Supp.A.-8.) Federal law imposes no such preemption of the Florida constitution and common law in this case. In particular, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) does not restrict access to the NPA. Federal Rule 6(e) restrains grand jurors, court reporters, government attorneys, interpreters a

he reply is due 10 days from service of the last-filed response. Opposing counsel has contacted counsel for respondents (William J. Berger for ■.; Diana L. Martin for M.; and Deanna K. Shullman for the Post), who have all advised they have no objection to this motion. 2 EFTA00184013 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a

quire confidentiality) (Supp.A.-8.) Federal law imposes no such preemption of the Florida constitution and common law in this case. In particular, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) does not restrict access to the NPA. Federal Rule 6(e) restrains grand jurors, court reporters, government attorneys, interpreters a

reply is due 10 days from service of the last-filed response. Opposing counsel has contacted counsel for respondents (William J. Berger for E.W.; Diana L. Martin for B.B.; and Deanna K. Shullman for the Post), who have all advised they have no objection to this motion. 2 EFTA00233660 -Q-~.......4.11 0-4-9