5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
UNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and.., Individually Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION BY VIDEO TO: All Counsel of Record PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the
EY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and.., Individually Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION BY VIDEO TO: All Counsel of Record PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individ
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M.,
vidence that would be inadmissible at trial, so long as it is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 1.280(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. (2008). Wherefore, Epstein requests that this court grant the relief requested herein, including, but not limited to, ordering that Edwards retu
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M.,
vidence that would be inadmissible at trial, so long as it is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 1.280(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. (2008). Wherefore, Epstein requests that this court grant the relief requested herein, including, but not limited to, ordering that Edwards retu
Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- VOLUME I OF II SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- VOLUME I OF II SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III. individual
Entities connected to both Complex Litigation and Fla.R.Civ

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION
Weissing
PERSON
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSONLuttier & Coleman
ORGANIZATIONMarc S. Nurik
PERSONPalm Beach Lakes Blvd
LOCATION
Michael Fisten
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJaffe
PERSON
Rosenfeldt
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON