ied in 18 U.S.C. §2255 in order to state a cause of action. Thus, Counts I through XXX against EPSTEIN are required to be dismissed. Rule 12(b)(6), Fla.R.Civ.P. (2) Count XXXI — Sexual Battery is also required to be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action as Plaintiff has failed to allege the re

ation of health care providers telephone numbers used by Epstein and his employees general information based on Florida Standard Interrogatories, Fla.R.Civ.P. Form 2, nos. 7, 10, 12 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 17 7 8 II, 12 13, 14, 164 These Interrogatories, on their face, do not infringe upon or otherwi

s and the defenses in the litigation"). W. The information simply falls under the "highly protected category of opinion work-product." Id; see also Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.280. Also, Counsel for Jane Does 2-8 in the Federal companion cases apparently obtained a copy of the file retained by the Palm Beach State

gment hearing, defendant objects to same since the note would need to be authenticated and no such document [sworn or certified copy as required by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e)] was filed in this case at least 20 days before the summary judgment hearing as required by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c). Plaintiff Has Never

ff'Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and requests that PlaintiffiCountenlefendant admit or deny the following facts, in accordance with Rule 1.370, Fla.R.Civ.P.: ADMISSIONS 1. You have acted on a sexual preference for minor females' on multiple occasions over the course of at least the last decade. 2.

EY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and.., Individually Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION BY VIDEO TO: All Counsel of Record PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.201 Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, Individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Individually, and

vidence that would be inadmissible at trial, so long as it is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 1.280(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. (2008). Wherefore, Epstein requests that this court grant the relief requested herein, including, but not limited to, ordering that Edwards retu

vidence that would be inadmissible at trial, so long as it is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 1.280(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. (2008). Wherefore, Epstein requests that this court grant the relief requested herein, including, but not limited to, ordering that Edwards retu

ation of health care providers telephone numbers used by Epstein and his employees general information based on Florida Standard Interrogatories, Fla.R.Civ.P. Form 2, nos. 7, 10, 12 I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 17 7 8 II, 12 13, 14, 164 These Interrogatories, on their face, do not infringe upon or otherwi

n of litigation or for trial. ace Alachua General Hospital. Inc. v. Zimmer USA. Inc., 403 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Fed.R. Civ.Pro. 26(bX3XB); Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.280; In re Faro Technologies Securities Litigation, 2008 WL 205318 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Lake Shore Radiator. Inc. v. Radiator Express Warehouse

/ Counterclaim Plaintiff Alan Dershowitz ("Dershowitz") requests that Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.350, produce for inspection and/or copying, at the offices of undersigned counsel, the documents and things listed on Schedule "A" below. GEN

COUNTY, FLORIDA Local Rule No. 6 IN RE: PETITIONS FOR REHEARING With the exception of motions for new trial or rehearing pursuant to rule 1.530, Fla.R.Civ.P., or similar procedural rule, no petition for rehearing, motion for reconsideration, or like pleading, shall be set for oral argument 'except up

ff'Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and requests that PlaintiffiCountenlefendant admit or deny the following facts, in accordance with Rule 1.370, Fla.R.Civ.P.: ADMISSIONS 1. You have acted on a sexual preference for minor females' on multiple occasions over the course of at least the last decade. 2.

ailed to state a cause of action under either common or statutory law, and thus, Count I against EPSTEIN is required to be dismissed. Rule 12(b)(6), Fla.R.Civ.P. Count I alleges in part that while Plaintiff was a minor, beginning when she was 14 — 6. On numerous occasions ..., JEFFREY EPSTEIN intentionall

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- VOLUME I OF II SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III. individual