Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear and Convincing Evidence Violated Appellant's Federal Due Process Rights. 32 H. THE COURT BASED ITS LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION UPON IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS. 36 A. The Court Improperly Assessed Points Against Appellant fo
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear and Convincing Evidence Violated Appellant's Federal Due Process Rights. 32 II. THE COURT BASED ITS LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION UPON IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS 36 A. The Court Improperly Assessed Points Against Appellant fo
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
) 27 Rossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (let Dep't 1989) Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 19 19 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 7 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) 7 Correction Law § 168-a(2) 9 Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 5, 9 Correction Law §
25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear and Convincing Evidence Violated Appellant's Federal Due Process Rights. 32 IL THE COURT BASED ITS LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION UPON IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS. 36 A. The Court Improperly Assessed Points Against Appellant fo
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ossi v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 103 A.D.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1984) 19 Solomon v. State of New York, 146 A.D.2d 439 (1st Dep't 1989) 19 Statutes 14 V.I.C. § 1722(b) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(d) 14 V.I.C. § 1724(e) Correction Law § 168-a(2) Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a) 7 7 7 9 5, 9 Correction Law § 168-
25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven by Clear and Convincing Evidence Violated Appellant's Federal Due Process Rights. 32 II. THE COURT BASED ITS LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION UPON IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS 36 A. The Court Improperly Assessed Points Against Appellant fo
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both V.I.C. and Federal Due Process Rights
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION57 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON52 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON25 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
New York
LOCATION24 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
George W. Bush
PERSON20 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
the State of New York
LOCATION12 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON9 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON8 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON8 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Legislature
ORGANIZATION7 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Bill Richardson
PERSON7 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
New York City
LOCATION6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
ORGANIZATION6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION7 w/ V.I.C.·3 w/ Federal
Adriana Ross
PERSON6 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Appellant
ORGANIZATION5 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
Gilbert
PERSON5 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal
New York District
LOCATION5 w/ V.I.C.·4 w/ Federal